| Press Releases | ||
|
Save The Swilly 25 September 2002 SAVE THE SWILLY WELCOMES EU STRATEGY ON COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT Save The Swilly has welcomed the European Commissions (EC) recent recommendation that aquaculture must be integrated "in strategies based on Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM)". Last week's statement from the EC on fish-farming acknowledges that there is potential conflict in coastal areas: "potential development is already hindered by competition for space between various users of coastal waters: small-scale, fisheries, aquaculture, tourism " And, "Stakeholders have not been sufficiently involved in policy shaping." A Save The Swilly spokesman said the groups substantial investment in the recently released Scoping Study for an ICZM Strategy for Lough Swilly was designed expressly to address the issue raised by the EC. Save The Swilly, an umbrella organisation representing 35 groups, continues to call for a moratorium on aquaculture licensing in Lough Swilly until risks and rewards of differing uses are assessed. Dr Andrew Cooper, co-author of the Scoping Study, believes "Various groups are not working together to make best use of [Lough Swilly's] valuable resource . . . Subsequently, major economic development opportunities are being missed." An overall plan is a common-sense starting point for an ICZM strategy, according to the STS spokesman. "All we have asked for is a genuine, independent and objective analysis of the best uses of Lough Swilly," said Mr Tony Morrison, the groups chairman. "We do not see commercial fishing, both white fish and inshore, as a hindrance to anything. Rather, these are traditional and legitimate pursuits of indigenous people, who are now confronted by the encroachment of a new competitor, aquaculture." Save The Swilly does not believe any one user of the coastal resource, which is public property, should be entitled to set the agenda or long-term strategy for a bay as valuable in economic and heritage terms as Lough Swilly. "We believe a strategy for Lough Swilly based on ICZM is the only way forward," said Mr Morrison. "We do not deny aquaculture has a right to exist, but we - and obviously, the EC agrees - believe other users are not being given their due regard," he added. It is not Save The Swillys desire nor intention to see a single job lost in the process of reaching agreement on the best management strategy for Lough Swilly. "Many people are seriously concerned about the lack of consultation and communication from the Department of Communications, Natural Resources and the Marine on intentions for Lough Swilly," Mr Morrison said. "We have asked senior politicians in the new coalition government elected last May, up to and including the Minister, to meet us and discuss our suggestions, which are based on independent research by the Coastal Studies Research Group at the University of Ulster. They have not fixed a time for any meeting yet." The question of employment is not as clear as it appears, STS believes, and there is some dispute as to whether jobs lost in fishing can be replaced by a smooth one-for-one transfer into increased aquaculture. According to a 1999 report to the EC Fisheries Directorate by MacAlister Elliot and Partners, "The potential contribution of aquaculture to generate employment in place of capture fishing jobs remains limited. . . . There would appear to be limited overlap of skills (apart from boat handling and handling of the harvested crop)," it concluded. Save The Swilly is urging all
parties concerned with Lough Swilly to take some time to consider the
recommendations contained in the University of Ulster Scoping Study, which
can be accessed at www.loughswilly.com
SAVE THE SWILLY
contacts:
|
Archived Press Releases:
| |