| Press Releases | ||
| Save The Swilly October 17, 2001 SALMON FARM WANTS STILL MORE LICENCES INSHORE The company engaged in salmon-farming operations in Lough Swilly is pursuing further licences in the lough, even though it has recently been awarded two additional licences and the full production quota it sought, a 50% increase in tonnage. A consultant has been employed by the company to conduct a Visual Impact Assessment, although in discussions with several Save The Swilly member groups, the consultant acknowledged that she was only assessing which of the two additional sites - Doaghbeg or Dooanmore - would be more suitable. She is expressly not being asked to assess whether either site is suitable, and she is not concerned with anything other than the visual impact. The consultant told Save The Swilly member groups that the company was "not interested" in the two additional Lough Swilly sites they were granted in May 2000, and asked the groups' representatives whether Doaghbeg or Dooanmore was preferable. She acknowledged that she had not arranged meetings with anyone in the Doaghbeg area, and had no plans to consult residents of Inishowen. Save The Swilly has called once again on the Department of the Marine and Natural Resources to clarify its plans for Lough Swilly. The umbrella group established a year ago was refused its demand - backed by a petition signed by more than 9,000 - for an independent baseline study and environmental impact assessment for Lough Swilly. It is now preparing a scoping document prior to commissioning an independent baseline study on behalf of residents surrounding the lough. "It is wholly inappropriate that the Department should even contemplate granting further licences in Lough Swilly when a wide cross-section of the population around Lough Swilly are demanding that further research be carried out before any expansion of the aquaculture industry in the lough is allowed," a Save The Swilly spokesperson said. He also drew attention to EU objections to aquaculture licensing procedures in Lough Swilly which remain unanswered, several months past the final date for response. The Minister of State at the Department of the Marine, Mr Hugh Byrne, said in an interview in April this year that "any large-scale [fish-farming] developments would have to be sited further offshore." Save The Swilly has called on the Minister to honour this position, and insists that fish-farming developments be concentrated out of Lough Swilly, where the environmental damage can be minimised. Scientists from the EU-LIFE Environment Programme, who produced the Rural Beach Management guide published by Donegal County Council, believe a second Blue Flag beach is possible for Portsalon, and An Taisce has indicated that it would be prepared to consider an application for a second Blue Flag Beach in Ballymastocker Bay. "It is true that both Doaghbeg and Dooanmore should be rejected as salmon-farming sites for visual impact reasons. But far more serious threats are to the wild fish in the lough, as well as to the compromised livelihood of commercial fishermen, and the recreational use of adjoining beaches. These locations are far too close to the existing Portsalon Blue Flag beach," Save The Swilly said. SAVE
THE SWILLY contacts:
|
Archived Press Releases:
| |