| Save
The Swilly July 11, 2005
ATTEMPT TO DOUBLE SALMON-FARMING
OUTPUT IN LOUGH SWILLY
Marine Harvest Ireland (MHI), a subsidiary of the world's largest salmon-farming
conglomerate, has revived an attempt to expand its operations in Lough
Swilly. A Scoping Letter circulated by MHI in recent weeks proposes a
doubling of the firm's licensed tonnage in the Donegal lough from 1,000
tonnes to 2,000 tonnes, targeting Portsalon, one of Ireland's most beautiful
scenic spots, and an expansion at Anny Point, near Rathmullan.
In a previous licensing decision,
MHI was allowed to increase production to 1,500 tonnes from 1,000 tonnes,
on condition that it used two sites. However, it has not produced any
fish at the Binnawheelmore or Callagh sites, and as such its maximum permitted
tonnage in Lough Swilly remains 1,000 tonnes a year. In December 2003,
a licence granted to MHI for a salmon-farming operation near Portsalon
was overturned by the Aquaculture Licences Appeals Board (ALAB). The company
is now attempting to re-apply at the same site, which is in full view
of the scenic Fanad Drive and within Ballymastocker Bay, the location
of one of Lough Swilly's two Blue Flag beaches.
ALAB, the final arbiter in
the aquaculture licensing process, is held up by the aquaculture industry
and by the Department of the Marine as evidence of the fair and democratic
nature of the aquaculture licensing process. The ALAB decision in 2003
was clear-cut, based on the over-riding conclusion that the Dooanmore/Portsalon
area is an unsuitable place for fish-farming. These are the reasons ALAB
gave for rejecting the previous Dooanmore licence:
"It is considered that
· ". . . the deterioration in water quality arising from the
proposed activity would have a negative impact on the recreational use
of the adjacent Portsalon Blue Flag Beach;
· ". . . the proposed activity constitutes an unacceptable
risk to navigation;
· ". . . the location of the proposed activity would give
rise to injury to visual amenity in an area visible from a designated
scenic and tourist route and within the views and prospects of special
amenity as designated in the Donegal County Development Plan 2000."
ALAB based its decision on
a detailed analysis by the Board's Inspector, who made these observations
in his report:
- "MHI's Environmental
Impact Statement did not assess the possible negative effect of fats
and lipids from the cages on the beach and swimmers. This discharge
will affect water quality and smell and could potentially impact on
swimmers using Stocker Strand."
- "MHI is a very significant
employer in the region, but there is no evidence that jobs would be
lost if the Dooanmore site is not licensed."
- "The visual impact
of 18 cages at Dooanmore would . . . be very substantial, would be contrary
to the County Donegal Development Plan 2000-2006 and the National Spatial
Strategy 2000-2020."
- "The holiday cottages
in Portsalon, which tend to be side-on to the site, will have their
view impacted."
- "If licensed, the presence
of the cages will be a physical barrier to commercial fishing, particularly
with nets. The ground around the site is sandy and suitable for both
demersal and pelagic fishing."
The attempt to seek a licence
at an identical site to one explicitly and legally overturned by ALAB
is an extraordinary slap in the face for the Appeals Board, and contravenes
both the letter and the spirit of the process. MHI chose not to pursue
its final legal option, a Judicial Review of the ALAB decision. Failure
to do this has closed the legal door to this site.
The MHI circular says they
have, in addition, "identified a revised site area, in the vicinity
of the existing Anny Point site". The Department of Marine's own
report, "Fishfarm Inspection Programme - Anny Point, Lough Swilly,
Co. Donegal T12/085", dated 8th August 2003, notes that MHI has been
operating outside its licensed area for some years: "As was the case
in the last audit, all cages are outside the licensed area…the situation
remains as it has for many years that there is no correlation between
cages on the water and the site actually licensed." This report also
states that harvest tonnage at the Anny Point site has substantially exceeded
the maximum allowed for that site. These serious issues were raised by
Buncrana Anglers Association to Marine Minister Pat The Cope Gallagher
in November 2004, but without response.
In a single stroke, a multinational
company (controlled by Dutch conglomerate Nutreco) is seeking to re-apply
for one Swilly site refused categorically by the highest aquaculture licensing
body in Ireland, and it also appears to be asking the Irish Government
to legalise operations at another site which have been "outside the
licensed area" for many years.
The company has set a deadline of Friday, 22nd July 2005 for written submissions.
SAVE THE SWILLY
contacts:
Email: info@loughswilly.com
Phone: Tony Morrison (353) 07493-63733
Phone: John Mulcahy (353) 07491-59113; (353) 086-2808636
Address: c/o Buncrana Anglers Association,
Castle Lane, Buncrana, Co. Donegal
Website: www.loughswilly.com
[back to top]
|
Archived
Press Releases:
September 25,
2006
Oyster
crisis exposes "shambles" in management of Swilly
July 11, 2005
Attempt
to double salmon-farming output in Lough Swilly
August 23, 2004
Which
part of "No" don't they understand?
June 2, 2004
Coulter
calls for political change in Donegal
December 15, 2003
Portsalon
salmon-farming licence refused by ALAB
November 05, 2003
Sea
Trout and Wild Salmon have been Victims of 'Ethnic Cleansing' - FISSTA
September 24,
2003
Prime
Time Exposes Aquaculture's Shortcomings
July 24, 2003
Save
the Swilly Calls for Farmed Salmon Mortality Monitor
July 21, 2003
Another
Disaster in Inver Bay - Inquiry Essential
July 17, 2003
Rural
Development Towards Sustainability
February 8, 2003
Save
the Swilly Meets Inishowen Politicians
February 3, 2003
Blue
Flag Beach Threatened by 80-Acre Fish Farm
January 29, 2003
Save
the Swilly 10,000-Signature Petition Accepted by Europe
January 28, 2003
New
Alliance Formed in Swilly
December 16, 2002
"Stop
Ripping Up the Swilly" Indigenous People Demand
December 13, 2002
Lough
Swilly's Indigenous Fishermen Speak Out
October1, 2002
Public
Meeting to Discuss Integrated Coastal Zone Management
September 25,
2002
Save
the Swilly Welcomes the Strategy on Coastal Zone Mangement
August 12, 2002
Integrated
Coastal Zone Management Proposal Launched
August 2, 2002
Questions
over decomposing salmon in Inver Bay
June 3, 2002
No
Room for Tradition in Lough Swilly
May 3, 2002
Save
the Swilly opts for "Swilly First"
May 3, 2002
Save
the Swilly/Green Party candidate withdraws
May 1, 2002
Save
the Swilly/Green Party candidate to contest Donegal North-East
April 18, 2002
Coulter
to be "Ambassador at Large" for Save the Swilly
March 25, 2002
Save
The Swilly presents 10,000-signature petition to EU
March
12, 2002
Study of Lough Swilly launched
November
30, 2001 STS letter to Hugh Byrne, Minister for State for the Department
of the Marine
November
27, 2001 ICZM and OSPAR - not Clams - for Swilly
October
17, 2001 Salmon farm wants still more licences inshore
September
17, 2001 Save the Swilly meets Labour Party
September
13, 2001 Save the Swilly meets Minister of State Byrne
September
1, 2001 Save the Swilly begins fundraising drive
August
28, 2001 Save the Swilly welcomes I.F.A. initiative
May
15, 2001 Expansion of salmon farming tragic for Swilly
April
9, 2001 Mussel barrels adrift in Lough Swilly
March 22, 2001 Save the Swilly presents petition
March
13, 2001 Save the Swilly questions Minister Byrne
March 11, 2001 Save
the Swilly reaffirms call for moratorium
February 20, 2001 Launch
of Save the Swilly website
January 24, 2001 An
open letter to the people on the shores of Lough Swilly:
January 16, 2001 Delegation
meets Minister Hugh Byrne
January 9, 2001 Save
The Swilly
(from looking like Mulroy Bay)
|